NWCC ad

Please visit our sponsors

DeSoto Observer Logo

A fresh new voice!


Back to Main Page

Back to Opinion Page

Super Bowl Ad Scores Continue to Decline Compared to 2008 and 2009 Ads

 

Flemington, NJ – Results of a national study that compared the 2008 and 2009 Super Bowl ads against this year’s ads revealed that the top five ads in 2010 scored statistically lower than the top five ads from similar studies conducted in 2008 and 2009.

The studies were conducted by HCD Research using its mediacurves.com website, during the Super Bowl broadcasts. To view the top five rankings and the ads from the 2008 and 2009 Super Bowls go to www.mediacurves.com

 

    

Comparing Top Five Super Bowl Ad Scores from 2008 through 2010

Top Five Ads 2008

Top Five Ads 2009

Top Five Ads 2010

FedEx - Pigeons                  80.71

Budweiser - Horse Circus  77.02 

Budweiser – Bull 72.78

Budweiser - Rocky               80.25

Budweiser  - Horse Fetch                   74.61

Snickers - Betty White        70.95

Coca-Cola - Balloons         78.51

Coca-Cola - Nature                             72.53

Denny’s - Grand Slam        67.12

Diet Pepsi - What is Love  76.66

Bridgestone - Potato Head                71.73

Doritos -  Hands-Off           66.82

Bridgestone - Squirrel          75.87

Budweiser - Coming to America       71.48

Flo TV- Generation             66.03

“Our comparison revealed that the top five Super Bowl ads scored statistically lower than the top five ads from the previous two years,” explained Glenn Kessler, president and CEO, HCD Research. “The steady decline in ad scores suggests that viewers’ attitudes may be somewhat jaded as a result of the sluggish economy. In addition, creative treatments and production values may have been comprised due to budget constraints.”

Ad Testing Methodology

During the game, the Super Bowl ads were inserted into an on-line survey and sent to thousands of study participants.  Participants answered questions regarding their perceptions of the ads using various parameters, including breakthrough, emotion, memorability and “word of mouth” impact of the ads. They also utilized an on-line dial testing system to indicate their levels of interest in the form of curves as they watched the ads.