|
|
Please visit our sponsors | |||||||
A fresh new voice! |
||||||||
Charters, I & II
February 10, 2010
?> By John Mayo
I have gotten a number of e-mails asking why I would prohibit private school board members and administrators from serving on any governing authority of a charter school. We have a history that I do not believe private school leaders yet understand and that has to be recognized. There is opposition to charter schools throughout the state, and in particular in the Delta, where private school supporters are pushing them. For any bill having a chance to pass, there must be no or limited participation by private school persons in organizing the charter school. In the House, not only are the overwhelming majority of minorities opposing charter schools, but so are the reps from school districts that are doing well. In other words, the senate bill as it now stands will have a tough time in committee and certainly on the floor of the House. I have put in my bill measures to gain support in the House for charter schools---address the failing or at risk of failing school conversion, having students who are in those schools be the first students in the charter school, letting the Mississippi Department of Education be the initiating charter authority, contracting with a recognized entity in the charter school field to manage the school, and implementing a performance contract with the Department. I understand that Department of Education prefers a bill similar to mine where a charter would address low performing schools. I will be hard put to support a bill that allows any local community group thinking they can do better to organize a charter school. There is ample evidence that these locally organized charter schools have no more or less an improved track record than the local public schools and end up financially failing as well.
John
P.S. The furlough I mentioned would be three days a year and be three of the seven professional improvement days schools have. Look, it's better than being terminated which can be done now, is it not? P.S. While I was writing this we were calling back up a bill that would require county medical examiners to be certified in forensic pathology and be on a Department of Public Safety approved list. I offered an amendment requiring the Attorney General to review all capital case convictions since 1980 to be reviewed where the conviction was based on forensic evidence. Recently, two men who had been on death row nearly 15 years were released due to faulty forensic evidence (DNA). They were in fact innocent and it took years of work by the Innocence Project to bring that out. The state is putting out more than $2,000,000 for that mistake, not to count that they lost 15 years of their lives, and the real murderer remaining free for that time.
February 10, 2010
By John Mayo
It is 12:33 and we are on lunch break until 1. At that time we will take up two education bills. The first is a no-brainer addressing sexual misconduct in teacher/student relations. The second addresses "New Start" schools. Authored by the Ed Committee Chair, Cecil Brown, the bill will allow the Mississippi Department of Education, in a school that has been failing for two years, to notify all---ALL---of the staff/employees of the school---everyone, that if they do not improve the third year they will all be terminated. MDE would then hire a new principal and that principal would hire a new staff. Although the Board would be involved in decision making, all decisions would be reviewed by MDE. An amendment, which I am second as author, will be offered that will allow the Department to contract with a charter school organization with a history of turning around schools to manage the "New School." Besides the new personnel, the school may be given a new name, mascot, school colors, and refurbished building. The amendment to be made will simply allow the Department to contract with a KIPP type organization we have heard ad infinatum about to manage the school. The amendment has most of what I was seeking in my bill: MDE makes the decision to charter, addresses failing schools, and contracts with proven organization. Only thing missing is prohibition of private board members or administrators from serving in leadership positions in the charter school....you take what you can get and I believe I can work that issue out in developing policy within MDE. The amendment makes sense because MDE will be putting out some $$$$ to "takeover" the school. May as well allow a proven entity to do it instead. In the end, the same goal is reached. Here is the location of the bill. The bill will probably come up about 1:15-1:20. I look for a 45-60 minute debate on the issue. www.billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2010/pdf/HB/1000-1099/HB1043CS.pdf
|